Evaluating sub-tenon anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery: efficacy and safety

Authors

  • Musawar Javed Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan
  • Nazullah Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan
  • Khkola Miraj Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59736/IJP.24.01.1047

Keywords:

Sub-Tennon , Cataract , MSIC , Ophthalmic anesthesia

Abstract

Background: Cataract remains the leading cause of preventable blindness worldwide. While local anesthesia is essential for cataract surgery, traditional techniques like peribulbar and retrobulbar blocks carry significant risks. Sub-Tenon anesthesia has emerged as a potentially safer alternative, though its efficacy rates vary widely in literature, and data from the local population is limited. Our objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sub-Tenon anesthesia in patients undergoing Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) at a tertiary care hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan.

Methods: This descriptive case series was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Hayatabad Medical Complex. A total of 148 patients undergoing MSICS under Sub-Tenon anesthesia were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Akinesia was assessed using a standardized scoring system (0-12) ten minutes after anesthetic administration, with complete akinesia (score=0) defined as effective. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative pain (measured using the 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain), surgical duration, and adverse events. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24 with appropriate statistical tests.

Results: The overall efficacy of Sub-Tenon anesthesia was 56.1% (83/148). Patients with effective blocks reported significantly lower pain scores (median VAS: 1.30 vs 3.90, p<0.001) and had shorter surgical duration (median: 26 vs 33 minutes, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that lower pain scores (adjusted OR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05-0.21, p<0.001) and shorter surgery duration (adjusted OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82-0.99, p=0.031) were significantly associated with effective anesthesia. The technique demonstrated favorable safety profile with only minor, self-limiting adverse events (overall incidence: 4.1%).

Conclusion: Sub-Tenon anesthesia provides moderate efficacy with exceptional safety for MSICS. Successful blocks are associated with significantly improved patient comfort and surgical efficiency. This technique represents a viable alternative to sharp-needle approaches, particularly in settings prioritizing patient safety.

Author Biographies

  • Musawar Javed, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar Pakistan

    Department of Ophthalmology

  • Nazullah, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Department of Ophthalmology

  • Khkola Miraj, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar Pakistan

    Department of Ophthalmology

References

Chen SP, Woreta F, Chang DF. Cataracts: a review. JAMA. 2025. In press.

Surico PL, Rossi T, Romano MR, Cagini C, Iannetta D. Sustainability in cataract and refractive surgery: current challenges and future perspectives. J Ophthalmol. 2025; 2025:4632626.

Bali J, Bali O. Essentials of ocular anaesthesia: techniques, indications, andcomplications.In:Anesthesiology— insights. London: Intech Open; 2025.

Koshy TA. A study comparing the effectiveness and side effects of subtenon's anesthesia using flexible 22G IV pediatric cannula versus peribulbar anesthesia dissertation. India: Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences; 2020.

Ginsburg RN, Duker JS. Globe perforation associated with retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia. Semin Ophthalmol. 1993;8(1):26-33.

Chua MJ, Seow W, Shen J, Wang CY. Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia for modern eye surgery—clinicians' perspective, 30 years after re-introduction. Eye. 2021;35(5):1295-1304.

Lozada GA, Macias AA. Eye blocks. In: Regional anesthesia and acute pain medicine: a problem-based learning approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2023. p. 117-29.

Kadhum M, Alshehri A, Alghamdi S, Jambi S. Operative outcomes for wide awake local anesthesia versus regional and general anesthesia for flexor tendon repair. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2022;41(1):125-30.

Reddy M. A detailed comparison of topical anesthesia and sub-Tenon block in ensuring patient comfort during cataract surgery dissertation. India: Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences; 2019.

Kumar V. A comparative study of sub-Tenons anaesthesia versus peribulbar anaesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery at Hanagal Shri Kumareshwar Hospital and Research Centre, Bagalkot dissertation. India: Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences; 2016.

Jongsareejit A, Jirasuwankul N, Wuthisiri W. Cost-effectiveness analysis of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification (PE). J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95(2):212-9.

Hayatabad Medical Complex. Official website. Available from: https://www.hmckp.gov.pk/.

Fasih U, Shaikh M, Ahmed J. Safety and efficacy of sub-Tenon anesthesia in anterior segment surgeries. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2011;27(3):145-9.

Kumar HS, Patil K. A study of comparison of sub-Tenon's anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery in RIMS Teaching Hospital Raichur. Int J Integr Med Sci. 2019;6(4):807-11.

Kurdi MS, Kaur M, Ganesh S, Raj K. Recent advancements in regional anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67(1):63-70.

MA S, Arshad M, Khan A. Optimizing pain management: a comparative review of regional anesthesia techniques for unilateral shoulder surgeries. Egypt Rev Med Health Sci. 2025;4(1):33-40.

Chang DF. Advanced IOL fixation techniques: strategies for compromised or missing capsular support. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

Issue

Section

Original article

How to Cite

1.
Javed M, Nazullah, Miraj K. Evaluating sub-tenon anesthesia in manual small incision cataract surgery: efficacy and safety. Int J Pathol [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 13 [cited 2026 Apr. 14];24(1):33-40. Available from: https://www.jpathology.com/index.php/OJS/article/view/1047